The Role of Nanoparticle Shape in Nanomedicine

The discipline of nanomedicine is in its development stage, and once developed, it can bring drastic changes in the arena of medicine through accurate targeting, better carrying capacity, and the fewest side effects. An important aspect that has an impact on the effectiveness of nanomedicine is the geometry of the nanoparticles. Nanoparticle geometry and size are critical in modulating the behaviour of nanoparticles in biosystems and, hence, cell uptake, biodistribution, and, in general, the therapeutic index. It becomes important to understand how these factors are affected by nanoparticle shape for the better development of nanomedicines. Thus, the article focuses on the concept of nanoparticle shape in nanomedicine and elaborates on the shapes listed in the first point, their behaviour concerning cells and tissue, and their potential for further development in medicine.

Understanding Nanoparticle Shapes

Nanoparticles can be prepared in different structures, such as spherical, rod, cube, and any format in the shape of stars, flowers, and so on. The physical and chemical attributes of each shape are different, as are the biological effects. For example, spherical nanoparticles are typically used to become ideal for synthesis, and their properties are clearly stated. However, non-spherical nanoparticles have revealed manipulated proficiency in particular applications because of the increased surface area as well as altered interactions with cells.

Spherical Nanoparticles

Among all types of nanoparticles applied in nanomedicine, spherical NPs are the most widespread due to their regular geometry, which provides controlled dispersion in bio environments. Due to their isotropic properties, optimal interaction with cellular membranes is achieved; therefore, they are used in drug delivery systems, imaging, and diagnosing. Yet, they can sometimes be restricted in what they can do compared to shapes of higher complexity.

Rod-Like Nanoparticles

Nanorods are elongated structures that offer a larger surface area-to-volume ratio relative to spherical nanoparticles. This increased surface area may prove useful in terms of cellular uptake as well as drug loading capacity. The optical properties of nanorods are also different from those of other types of nanoparticles, allowing for their use in photothermal therapies, diagnostic procedures, and other related uses. They are long-shaped, so they can have better penetration into tissues; this should be considered a plus for certain types of cancer.

Cubic and Polyhedral Nanoparticles

Among all the nanoparticles, cubic and polyhedral ones are preferable because of the presence of multiple facets with many binding sites for targeting moieties or drugs. These shapes can improve the stability and practical loading of the therapeutic agents. Also, their smooth edges and corners are likely to affect cellular uptake mechanisms, which in turn enhance the local delivery of therapeutic agents to certain cellular sub-compartments.

Yearwise Publication Trend on nanomedicine

Find publication trends on relevant topics

Impact of Nanoparticle Shape on Cellular Uptake

This paper also showed that the shape of the nanoparticles affects how they are taken up by cells, which is a key attribute of drug delivery. Shapes entering cells also have distinct behaviours of engaging with cellular membranes and influencing the internalisation step as well as intracellular transport. For instance, spherical NPs are internalised more efficiently by cells because they cause a lower degree of membrane deformation. Similar to spherical ones, the cubical and cylindrical nanoparticles are internalised more slowly as compared with the spherical ones, though they can penetrate deeper into tissues because of their morphology.

It has been identified that in the course of the assorted types of nanoparticles interacting with the cellular membranes, the orientation in which the nanorods make contact with the membranes determines how they will be internalised. The internalisation of nanorods is more efficient when they are parallel to the membrane as compared to nanorods oriented perpendicular to the membrane. This suggests that the uptake depends on orientation; therefore, shape plays a key role in creating good nanomedicine.

Biodistribution and Pharmacokinetics

They added that, besides size, shape is another factor that affects the biodistribution of nanoparticles within the body. Drug nanoparticles have to transport across biological barriers such as the vasculature, tissue, and cell layers to reach the desired sites. Particle size determines the rate and extent of circulation within the body and the rate at which particles are cleared from the body.

Spherical nanoparticles generally have longer half-lives because they do not readily opsonize and are cleared quickly by the RES. Whereas, the nanoparticles in the form of rod-like structures are removed relatively rapidly because the elongated particle shape is easier to identify for the RES and eliminate. However, due to their three-dimensional structure, it is also possible to apply passive targeting to some tissues, for instance, tumor tissues, since long nanoscale particles can penetrate better.

Therapeutic Efficacy and Targeting

Indeed, the morphology of the nanoparticles is a key determinant of their therapeutic potential and ability to target specific tissues. Nanoparticles with unusual shapes, like nanorods, ovals, or polyhedrals, can increase the loading and release characteristics of drugs and thus the therapeutic effect. For instance, it indicates that with a larger surface area, nanorods can help achieve better-controlled release of the drugs, which minimises dosage and increases the chances of patients’ compliance.

In addition, enhanced geometries of nanoparticles, such as those that are non-spherical, can enhance active targeting by presenting several target binding sites. Thus, this multivalency contributes to the high specificity and affinity of nanoparticles to the target cells or tissues, thus improving the accuracy of drug delivery and decreasing side effects.

Future Directions and Challenges

Thus, the impact of nanoparticle shape in nanomedicine is clearly defined, yet several issues have to be addressed to fully unleash this potential. An important problem beyond the synthesis of spherical nanoparticles is the reproducibility of the formation of nanoparticles with the desired shapes and sizes. These problems are still a challenge, and researchers are now looking into template synthesis and self-assembling methods for the fabrication of nanoscale structures.

Furthermore, knowledge about the relationship between nanoparticles and biological processes on the molecular level is important for their proper engineering. This entails cross-disciplinary studies that have materials science, biology, and medicine as the critical components. These interactions can be studied with the help of modern methods in imaging and analysis, including cryo-electron microscopy and single particle tracking, which can inform more efficient nanomedicines.

Recent Publications on nanomedicine

Find publications on relevant topics

Conclusion

The shape of nanoparticles has been seen as a major determinant in the field of nanomedicine, especially in the aspects of cell internalisation, targeting, drug delivery speed, and effectiveness. It is well worth noting that most of the spherical NPs have been investigated and employed, but non-spherical NPs like nanorods, cubes, or polyhedrons have some privileges that, if implemented, can improve the efficacy of nanomedicines. The advanced key in nanomedicine specifically focuses on the control and understanding of the shape of nanoparticles for enhancing the effectiveness of the treatment of numerous

References

  1. Kinnear, C., Moore, T.L., Rodriguez-Lorenzo, L., Rothen-Rutishauser, B. and Petri-Fink, A., 2017. Form follows function: nanoparticle shape and its implications for nanomedicineChemical reviews117(17), pp.11476-11521.
  2. Kumar V, Bayda S, Hadla M, Caligiuri I, Russo Spena C, Palazzolo S, Kempter S, Corona G, Toffoli G, Rizzolio F. Enhanced Chemotherapeutic Behavior of Open-Caged DNA@Doxorubicin Nanostructures for Cancer Cells. J Cell Physiol. 2016 Jan;231(1):106-10. doi: 10.1002/jcp.25057. PMID: 26031628.
  3. Kumar, V., Palazzolo, S., Bayda, S., Corona, G., Toffoli, G. and Rizzolio, F., 2016. DNA nanotechnology for cancer therapy. Theranostics6(5), p.710.
  4. Palazzolo S, Hadla M, Russo Spena C, Caligiuri I, Rotondo R, Adeel M, Kumar V, Corona G, Canzonieri V, Toffoli G, Rizzolio F. An Effective Multi-Stage Liposomal DNA Origami Nanosystem for In Vivo Cancer Therapy. Cancers (Basel). 2019 Dec 12;11(12):1997. doi: 10.3390/cancers11121997. PMID: 31842277; PMCID: PMC6966502.
  5. Palazzolo S, Hadla M, Spena CR, Bayda S, Kumar V, Lo Re F, Adeel M, Caligiuri I, Romano F, Corona G, Canzonieri V, Toffoli G, Rizzolio F. Proof-of-Concept Multistage Biomimetic Liposomal DNA Origami Nanosystem for the Remote Loading of Doxorubicin. ACS Med Chem Lett. 2019 Jan 31;10(4):517-521. doi: 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.8b00557. PMID: 30996789; PMCID: PMC6466551.
  6. Yuan Y, Gu Z, Yao C, Luo D, Yang D. Nucleic Acid-Based Functional Nanomaterials as Advanced Cancer Therapeutics. Small. 2019 Jun;15(26):e1900172. doi: 10.1002/smll.201900172. Epub 2019 Apr 11. PMID: 30972963.
  7. Oran D, Rodriques SG, Gao R, Asano S, Skylar-Scott MA, Chen F, Tillberg PW, Marblestone AH, Boyden ES. 3D nanofabrication by volumetric deposition and controlled shrinkage of patterned scaffolds. Science. 2018 Dec 14;362(6420):1281-1285. doi: 10.1126/science.aau5119. PMID: 30545883; PMCID: PMC6423357.
  8. Gnach, A., Lipinski, T., Bednarkiewicz, A., Rybka, J. and Capobianco, J.A., 2015. Upconverting nanoparticles: assessing the toxicity. Chemical Society Reviews44(6), pp.1561-1584.
  9. Du G, Moulin E, Jouault N, Buhler E, Giuseppone N. Muscle-like supramolecular polymers: integrated motion from thousands of molecular machines. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2012 Dec 7;51(50):12504-8. doi: 10.1002/anie.201206571. Epub 2012 Oct 18. PMID: 23081866.
  10. Sciau P (2012) Nanoparticles in Ancient Materials: The Metallic Lustre Decorations of Medieval Ceramics. The Delivery of Nanoparticles. InTech. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/34080.

Top Experts on “nanomedicine